Department of Transportation, Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule-Making on Traveling by Air With Service Animals

Dear Graduates of the Seeing Eye:

As many of you know, the U.S. Department of Transportation has issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making (ANPRM) concerning air travel with service animals. This document provides notice to the public that DOT plans to amend and clarify its regulations implementing the Air Carrier Access Act in light of the challenges people working with service animals are facing during air travel. DOT is seeking comments from the public on 10 specific questions. You can submit comments by July 9 either on line, by fax, or by mail. The ANPRM issued by the DOT can be found at

As graduates of The Seeing Eye, this is an opportunity for your voice to be heard. If you have experienced difficulties during air travel with your guide that you feel could be eliminated with clearer rules about traveling with service animals, we urge you to consider submitting a comment at

Please do your best to answer the specific questions asked so that your comments will be as helpful as possible to DOT.

Below is the text of a comment The Seeing Eye just submitted to DOT. The Seeing Eye has worked for decades to make sure guide dog users have equal access to air travel but we cannot do it without help and support from our graduates. Thank you for taking part in this process. As always, if you have questions about advocacy or access issues, feel free to email us at or call us at 1-800-539-4425.

Thank you,

Melissa Allman, Esq.
Senior Specialist, Advocacy and Government Relations
The Seeing Eye

To: The U.S. Department of Transportation

From: The Seeing Eye, Inc.

Re: DOT-OST-2018-0068, RIN No. 2105-AE63

Traveling by Air with Service Animals

The Seeing Eye has been providing specially bred and trained guide dogs for people who are blind or have low vision since 1929. Since that time, The Seeing Eye has worked tirelessly to advocate for the rights of guide dog users to have equal access to all modes of transportation including air travel. At present, there are over 1,700 active Seeing Eye graduates in North America and many of those people are regular air travelers. As Senior Advocacy Specialist and a guide dog handler myself, I am submitting the below comments on behalf of The Seeing Eye. I commend DOT’s efforts to amend and clarify its ACAA regulations to ensure safe and equal access to air travel for people who work with service animals. The Seeing Eye’s position on the questions posed in the ANPRM is as follows:

Question 1: Whether psychiatric service animals should be treated similarly to other service animals;

Question 2: Whether there should be a distinction between emotional support animals and other service animals;

Comments to questions 1 and 2: Service animals should be defined as those that are 1) individually trained to do work or perform tasks for a person with a disability and 2) public access trained. Animals that do not meet both of these criteria should be designated as a separate and distinct category from service animals.

Question 3: whether emotional support animals should be required to travel in pet carriers for the duration of the flight;

Comment: Animals should be permitted to travel in the cabin without being crated as long as they meet the criteria in the definition of service animal proposed in comments 1 and 2.

Question 4: Whether the species of service animals and emotional support animals that airlines are required to transport should be limited;

Comment: With respect to the species of service animals, the amended DOT regulations should be consistent with the Department of Justice regulations implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act. The result would be that the species of service animals would be limited to dogs and in some narrow circumstances, miniature horses.

Question 5: whether the number of service animals/emotional support animals should be limited per passenger;

Comment: The Seeing Eye is concerned that as the number of service animals traveling with a handler increases, the likelihood that the handler will be able to effectively control the animals decreases.

Question 6: Whether an attestation should be required from all service animal and emotional support animal users that their animal has been trained to behave in a public setting;

Comment: No. An attestation would have no value because passengers could provide assurances that the animal is trained to behave appropriately in public regardless of the animal’s actual behavior and there would be no way to determine the veracity of these statements. Existing guidelines allow airlines to refuse to transport service animals that are engaging in disruptive or threatening behavior such as excessive barking, biting, growling, jumping, eliminating in the terminal or aircraft, etc. Furthermore, if the definition of service animal is limited to those that are trained to perform work or tasks and public access trained, and all other animals were required to be in pet carriers, airlines would be far less likely to have problems with unruly or aggressive animals.

Question 7: Whether service animals and emotional support animals should be harnessed, leashed, or otherwise tethered;

Comment: Service animals should be leashed or otherwise under the handler’s control at all times. There are times during air travel when it may be appropriate for a passenger using a guide dog to remove its harness for the comfort and safety of the dog. However, the guide dog handler still has control over the dog in these limited circumstances because the leash is the means of control.

Question 8: Whether there are safety concerns with transporting large service animals and if so, how to address them;

Comment: If DOT adopts the definition of service animal proposed in comments 1 and 2, these safety concerns would be greatly decreased. On page 34, The ANPRM states in part that

“Airlines have … expressed safety concerns about large service animals in the cabin, particularly large emotional support animals that have not received disability-mitigation training. … While the Department previously concluded that a service animal’s reasonable use of a portion of an adjacent seat’s foot space does not deny another passenger effective use of the space for his or her feet and is not an adequate reason for the carrier to refuse to permit the animal to accompany its user at his or her seat, some airlines have indicated that passengers feel pressured to agree to such an arrangement and have later expressed to airline personnel their dissatisfaction at having to share their foot space.”

If DOT requires air carriers to transport only dogs that are trained to mitigate a disability and behave appropriately in public, it will be easier for air carriers to simultaneously accommodate passengers using service animals and assuage the potential concerns of passengers who are being asked to help make that accommodation possible.

Question 9: whether airlines should be prohibited from requiring a veterinary health form or immunization record from service animal users without an individualized assessment that the animal would pose a direct threat to the health or safety of others or would cause a significant disruption in the aircraft cabin;

Comment: Yes. Airlines should be prohibited from requiring a veterinary health form or immunization record from service animal users in advance of travel. This requirement would place burdens and restrictions on service animal users that are not placed on other passengers. For example, the requirement could prevent service animal users from traveling on short notice or checking in on line or at curb side. Moreover, once an air carrier has made an individualized assessment that a service animal would pose a direct threat or cause a significant disruption in an aircraft cabin, veterinary records do nothing to mitigate the threat the animal potentially poses and DOT regulations do not obligate air carriers to transport the animal under those circumstances.

In closing, The Seeing Eye expresses its appreciation to DOT for the opportunity to participate in the advanced rule making process on an issue that is of paramount importance to our organization as a whole and our graduates as individuals. If The Seeing Eye can provide any further assistance or information on issues raised in this ANPRM given our areas of expertise, please feel free to contact us.

Melissa R. Allman, Esq.
Senior Specialist, Advocacy and Government Relations
The Seeing Eye, Inc.

P.O. Box 375, Morristown, NJ 07963-0375 (mail)
10 Washington Valley Road, Morristown, NJ 07960-3412 (deliveries)
973-539-4425 ext. 1724
Fax: 973-525-1081

About claire plaisted

Claire Plaisted lives in New Zealand with her husband, three children. She is a Indie Author and runs a company 'Plaisted Publishing House Ltd,' helping Indie Authors get their books online and looking professional. We are happy for people to submit their work for our team to look through.
This entry was posted in Information, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Department of Transportation, Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule-Making on Traveling by Air With Service Animals

  1. Patty says:

    Thank you Claire for blogging this on my behalf. This week of tech trails has been quite challenging I could not have made it through without you. Trials LOL.

    Sent from my iPhone


    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s